John-1-1-Theology.htm--SBT Sent a John 1:1 list to the Experts of Jehovah-s-Witnesses-1617/Theology -9/1/2006
Jehovah`s Witness - Theology
Here
what was sent to Janko -
And
view His Answer after the list and the View
Follow-Ups
TO Expert: Janko - 9/1/2006
Question
Infro For You from www.simplebibletruths.net
A Non-Trinitarian Oneness Reference Library is Online---Check This Out
Who First Translated John1.1 Right =After The Nicene Creed Makers
SBT1-
Some Say The Truth Hurts or Hurts There Cause.
Here is a List of Historical Bibles that The Oneness and Tri-ist Ignore.
IGNORING THIS HISIORICAL LIST OF---JOHN 1.1 –WHY ?
–Ask Those Who Do—
and Show Them This
(1) In a beginning was the Word, and the Word was with
the God, and a god was the Word.
Diaglot
1865 Diaglot NT Free
Downloads For Diaglot
C/H -open--- http://www.onlinebible.net/bibles2.html Online Now
See No.’s—52 THRU 56-For Whose in Harmony—And Online Now-
JOHN1onePLUS
No 1 --on Yahoo Search—Enter JOHN1onePLUS.htm
See at the Top of this page-Open
http://search.yahoo.com/search?ei=UTF-8&p=JOHN1onePLUS&xargs=0&pstart=1&fr=slv1-...
(2) Harwood, 1768, "and was himself a divine person"
(3) Newcome, 1808, "and the word was a god"
(4) Thompson, 1829, "the Logos was a god
(5) Goodspeed, 1939, "the Word was divine
(6) Torrey, 1947, "the Word was god
(7) New English, 1961, "what God was,the Word
was"
(8) Moffatt, 1972, "the Logos was divine
(9) Reijnier Rooleeuw,
1694, "and the Word was a god"
(10) Simple English Bible, "and the Message was Deity"
(11) Hermann Heinfetter, 1863, [A]s a god the Command
was"
(12) Abner Kneeland, 1822,
"The Word was a God"
(13) Robert Young, 1885, (Concise Commentary) "[A]nd
a God (i.e. a Divine Being) was the Word"
(14) Leicester Ambrose, 1879, "And the logos was a god"
(15) Charles A.L. Totten, 1900, "the Word was
Deistic [=The Word was Godly]
(16) J.N. Jannaris, 1901, [A]nd
was a god"
(17) George William Horner, 1911, [A]nd (a) God was
the word"
(18) Ernest Findlay Scott, 1932, "[A]nd the Word
was of divine nature"
(19) ames L. Tomanec, 1958,
[T]he Word was a God"
(20) Philip Harner, 1974, "The Word had the same
nature as God"
(21) Maximilian Zerwich S.J./Mary Grosvenor,
1974, "The Word was divine"
(22) Siegfried Schulz, 1975, "And a god (or, of a divine kind) was the
Word"
(23) Translator's NT, 1973, "The Word was with God and shared his nature
(24) Barclay, 1976, "the nature of the Word was the same as the nature of
God"
(25) Schneider, 1978, "and godlike sort was the Logos
(26) Schonfield, 1985, "the Word was divine
(27) Revised English, 1989, "what God was, the Word was
(28) Cotton Parch Version, 1970, and the Idea and God were One
(29) Scholar's Version, 1993, "The Divine word and wisdom was there with
God, and it was what God was
(30) Madsen, 1994, "the Word was <EM>a divine Being"
(31) Becker, 1979, "ein Gott
war das Logos" [a God/god was the Logos/logos]
(32) Stage, 1907, "Das Wort
war selbst gttlichen Wesens" [The Word/word was itself a divine
Being/being].
(33) Bhmer, 1910, "Es war fest mit Gott verbunden,
ja selbst gttlichen Wesens" [It was
strongly linked to God, yes itself divine Being/being]
(34) Thimme, 1919, "Gott
von Art war das Wort"
[God of Kind/kind was the Word/word]
(35) Baumgarten et al, 1920, "Gott (von Art) war der
Logos" [God (of Kind/kind) was the Logos/logos]
(36) Holzmann, 1926, "ein
Gott war der Gedanke" [a God/god was the Thought/thought]
(37) Rittenlmeyer, 1938, "selbst
ein Gott war das Wort" [itself a God/god
was the Word/word]
(38) Lyder Brun (Norw. professor of NT theology), 1945, "Ordet var av
guddomsart" [the Word was of divine kind]
(39) Pfaefflin, 1949, "war von gttlicher Wucht [was of divine
Kind/kind]
(40) Albrecht, 1957, "gttlichen Wesen hatte das
Wort" [godlike Being/being had the Word/word]
(41) Smit, 1960, "verdensordet
var et guddommelig vesen" [the word of the world was a divine being]
(42) Menge, 1961, "Gott
(= gttlichen Wesens) war das Wort"[God(=godlike
Being/being) was the Word/word)
(43) Haenchen, 1980, "Gott
(von Art) war der Logos" [God (of Kind/kind) was
the Logos/logos]
(44) Die Bibel in heutigem
Deutsch, 1982, "r war bei Gott
und in allem Gott gleich"[He was with God and in all like God]
(45) Haenchen (tr. By R. Funk), 1984, "divine
(of the category divinity)was the Logos"
(46) Schultz, 1987, "ein Gott
(oder: Gott von Art) war das Wort" [a God/god (or:
God/god of Kind/kind) was the Word/word].
(47) William Temple, Archbishop of York, 1933, "And the Word was
divine."
(48) John Crellius, Latin form of German, 1631,
"The Word of Speech was a God"
(49) Greek Orthodox /Arabic translation, 1983, "the word was with
Allah[God] and the word was a god"
(50) Ervin Edward Stringfellow (Prof. of NT Language
and Literature/Drake University, 1943, "And the Word was Divine"
(51) Robert Harvey, D.D., 1931 "and the Logos was divine (a divine being
To see how Jesus was described at John 1:1 in the most ancient Coptic texts,
C/H- http://www.integlogic.com/sahidica/pages/sahidicpaper1990.html
It is noteworthy that the New Testament was translated into three languages
during the Koine period (b.330 AD), that is, while
the Koine (common) Greek
was still the lingua franca of the Roman world and universally understood
C/H- http://depts.washington.edu/cartah/text_archive/coptic/coptjohn.shtml,
For
Best Non Trinity Bibles open BestNonTrinityBibles.htm
JOHN1onePLUS.htm-- Open- Theology.htm and TheGWGPNC
Rule.htm
Vine’s Dictionary on a-god--VinesOn-agodPLUS.htm---- Open For Preface.htm --
ThePeoplesCourt.htm
SBT ABOUTUS.htm
With Spiritual Love Always---GW
Get the answer below
Answer
We know all these facts that there are many versions
of John 1:1, nothing knew to me or our organization. Whats the point of this?
This fact is all cleared up for us . In the last book
of the Bible, namely, in Revelation 19:13, John calls him “The Word of God,”
saying: “And his name is called The Word of God.” (AV; Dy)
Note that his name is not called “God the Word,” but is called “The Word of
God,” or God’s Word. Hence John 1:1 must mean, at most, that the Word was of
God.
Janko—Ask What’s the point of this
Answer
GW writes on 2006-09-03
Excellent Answer-Janko--The point is you got it—you got the
point—Congregations--Many do not.
There are many versions of John 1:1, but
Millions of People think
The JW’s NWT is the Only One that Translates
it that way---and the word was a god—
Now your readers can know the truth also.
But there is more!!!
How does this tie into the Real Theology of the Original Manuscripts---Part of
the answer is in your WT Library. Print the articles for your
Viewers --if you can find them in your Library.
There are only partial articles in Your Library that discloses the matter –and-
addresses it to the Original Manuscripts-.
Do you need help with what keywords (it takes) to pull them up in your WT
Library search engine to show your Viewers ??
The WT has it right –but needs to extend on it---
It would be nice for you to get them out of your Library for your Readers --if
you can--- GW
The Question Should be Posted as Theology effects Jn
1.1 How and Why Compared to the Original Manuscripts-?
This Question goes beyond any Versions--or Translaton---Janko--Are you a Translator ?
GW
N0 1 On google list
·
Jehovah`s Witness:
Theology, william horner, nicene creed
(4) Thompson, 1829, "the Logos was
a god (5) Goodspeed, 1939, "the Word was divine (6) Torrey, 1947,
"the Word was god (7) New English, 1961, "what God was ...
en.allexperts.com/q/Jehovah-s-Witness-1617/Theol
.. - 22k - Similar
pages
http://en.allexperts.com/q/Jehovah-s-Witness-1617/Theology.htm
·
Jehovah`s Witness: question followups
1768 and was himself a divine person ... Harwood 1808 and
the word was a god ... Newcome 1829 the Logos was a god ... Thompson
1864 and a god was the Word . ...
en.allexperts.com/q/Jehovah-s-Witness-161...
- 21k - Similar
pages